Contact Associates in Urology - Pioneers in Urology Patient Information and Forms Directions to Our Office - Associates in Urology - West Orange, New Jersey Referring Physician Information Associates in Urology - Pioneers in Urology Home Associates in Urology Pysicians and Staff Urological Clinical Conditions Robotic Urological Surgery Associates in Urology CLinical Trials

Main

March 3, 2007

What is proper etiquette for the newly diagnosed cancer patient/doctor relationship?

I received a phone call yesterday from a young man that was newly diagnosed with prostate cancer from the southeast.

He was interested in robotic surgery and had several questions.

He told me he found a local urologist who performs robotic surgery and asked me what kind of questions he could ask. He was turned off by his primary urologist who he felt, was not interested in speaking about robotics.

Among the questions he asked me was "Can I ask the robotic surgeon how many of these operations he has done?"

That got me to thinking about what are proper questions to ask and what are proper things a physician should do?

The specifics of my thoughts will be for prostate cancer, but the generalities can be diagnosed for many cancer, surgical, and other medial problems.

I personally perform about 6-10 consultations per week for newly diagnosed urologic cancer (mostly prostate, but also bladder and kidney, and less often adrenal and testis.)

What I usually tell patients is that they should feel free to ask anything. They can also interrupt me if they need to without worry while I am speaking.

I think the number of a certain procedure that someone performs is fair. I think how old they are is also fair. Board certification, how long they have been in private practice, and any question is OK to ask.

I recommend patients come in with their families and to take notes. Several patients have had recorders, which I personally do not like very much, but do let patients record our consultation if they choose.

I am open to discussing any therapy for their ailment. For example, for my newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients, we discuss watchful waiting, hormonal therapy, surgery (concentrating on open and robotic (touch on laparoscopic non-robotic); radiation (XRT, seeds, combination, and now cyberknife as a local hospital is advertising it); cryosurgery and HIFU (which is currently not approved by the FDA in the US).

I have had one experience I did not appreciate. I was helping my partner with a patient of his who had a few questions for me. The patient stood up and stepped into my personal space (about 6 inches from my face) and asked me a direct question while staring at me. He explained later he wanted to look into my eyes to see if he believed my answer, regarding whether I could perform his complicated surgery. I did answer questions for about 5 minutes after that.

Other than that, I do not recall being bothered by any question, and if I feel it is irrelevant, may choose not to answer a question, but am not insulted by it.

I also do not have a problem referring patients to different institutions or for different therapies than I can not provide. Our group has not performed an open prostatectomy in over 2 years, so if someone wants an open operation, I refer them to a few excellent open surgeons in our area.

My goal is to make the patient and his family feel as comfortable as possible and choose the therapy or surgeon that they feel most comfortable with. That being said I do, as most physicians do, recommend the therapy that I do best: robotic surgery for prostate cancer. I provide a secure email and ask patients to call or email me if they have any followup questions.

I also suggest second opinions as I believe it helps a patient have more than one opinion on their problem. I often give out the name of a radiation oncologist who I trust, but sometimes a medical oncologist if that would be beneficial.

I also give out the names of 2 robotic surgeons that I would go to if someone in my family had prostate cancer if asked.

I give patients the option of speaking to 2 patients of mine that are similar to them in age and preoperative medical condition. This allows them to speak to someone who had what I expect to be a similar experience. Having a 73 year old man speak to a 53 year old man will not help very much, but he should speak to someone who is in his 70s.

I would welcome input from other physicians and patients about their feelings on this topic, as I am sure my views are not the only views.

March 2, 2007

Robotic reliability

I often get asked about the reliability of the daVinci robot and can it break down. I also received a comment from a reader about a bad experience with her husbands robotic surgery.

In my 299 robotic operations, we have had several problems.

The daVinci robots are complicated mechanical devices. They can break down. Robots can break down in different ways. They can have hardware failures, such as broken arms. We had this happen to our 4th arm on our standard daVinci once and performed the operation with only 3 arms.

They can have software failures and the robot is made to stop working and will not allow you to move any instruments. This happened twice. Once it was for a robotic nephrectomy which I converted to a laparoscopic nephrectomy without trouble.

The other one was 3/4 of the way through a davinci S dvP and I brought in our standard robot, which was not in use, and finished the operation with our 2nd robot.

2 other operations were affected by robotic failures that were discovered before the operation was started and 1 case was cancelled and 1 was delayed until our robot was fixed.

Robots can break down occasionally, and contingency plans should be in place, including conversion to laparoscopy or open surgery.

I am not familiar with any injuries caused by robotic failure or malfunction.

August 24, 2006

Genetics and inherited prostate cancer risk

 Prostate Cancer: Major Genetic Risk Factor Found: "Harvard Medical School researchers have identified a DNA segment on chromosome 8 that is a major risk factor for prostate cancer, especially in African American men. The paper appears in the August electronic edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (also see PNAS's news tip below).

'This paper identifies a genetic risk factor that about doubles the likelihood of prostate cancer in younger African American men,' says principal investigator David Reich, PhD, Harvard Medical School assistant professor of genetics with the HMS Department of Genetics and the Broad Institute. 'This finding may explain why younger African Americans have an increased risk for prostate cancer than do other populations--and may also explain why this increased risk in African Americans attenuates with older age.'"

Source: Medical News Today

Continue reading "Genetics and inherited prostate cancer risk" »

April 16, 2006

Robotic Prostate Surgery

Although there is a growing number of prostates being removed robotically, there are many people and top urologists questioning the benefit of the da Vinci prostatectomy over the established open approach. This was recently debated on ABC News.

I do find it interesting in that how some urologists that I deeply respect are heavily in favor of it, including one of my mentors at Indiana University, Dr. Koch.

One person who I have failed to meet as of yet, is a urologist who has performed a lot of these procedures, and then decided that the robot was not necessary and reverted back to the regular laparoscopic or open approach.

Many of the top open prostate surgeons are now performing robotic prostatectomies.

April 8, 2006

Follow to :Robotic Surgery: Is it truly robotic surgery or will it ever be?

Source: National Post (Canada)







After
Sunday's project with NASA, Dr. Anvari's team will focus on a new, even
more mind-bending phase: "semi-autonomous" robots that are programmed to
do surgical procedures on their own, without a physician directly
controlling their movements.


Apparently there is a physician, Dr. Mehran Anvari, in Canada who according to the National Post is working on ways to program surgical robots to perform surgery. The article did not say which surgical robot he was using.

His main success so far is in telesurgery, an area that I am excited about. I am looking forward to the day when I can perform surgery on patients in the other parts of the country and world.

April 6, 2006

Robotic Surgery: Is it truly robotic surgery or will it ever be?

I was giving a talk today at New Jersey City University and was asked a good question.

Do I think that robotic surgery will change so the robot does the surgery?

Currently the da Vinci Surgical system is a master-slave system, where the surgeon is the master and the console is the slave. The da Vinci system translates a surgeons movements, but does not act independently in any way, meaning that it is not a true "robot". I have described the robotic system previously.

I was asked if I thought the day would come when there would be a true robotic system that can be programmed to perform surgery more accurately?

Continue reading "Robotic Surgery: Is it truly robotic surgery or will it ever be?" »

January 5, 2006

What is your youngest robotic prostatectomy patient?

The younger the patient, the more years he has to live. Cure rates are extremely important and long term side effects are equally important.

Continue reading "What is your youngest robotic prostatectomy patient?" »

January 4, 2006

Is Prostate Cancer Transmissible?

Every now and then I get a really good question from a patient that I have never heard before. I am making a new category on my blog for these type of questions.

A patient of mine who was recently diagnosed with prostate cancer asked me today if his wife could catch prostate cancer. His concern stemmed from the fact that his original presenting symptom was blood in the semen.

Continue reading "Is Prostate Cancer Transmissible?" »