Contact Associates in Urology - Pioneers in Urology Patient Information and Forms Directions to Our Office - Associates in Urology - West Orange, New Jersey Referring Physician Information Associates in Urology - Pioneers in Urology Home Associates in Urology Pysicians and Staff Urological Clinical Conditions Robotic Urological Surgery Associates in Urology CLinical Trials

« SELECT: Selenium, vitamin E show no benefit in prostate cancer prevention - - UrologyTimes | Main | Risk of prostate cancer unaffected by antibiotic treatment »

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Single-Surgeon Analysis of >100 Consecutive Procedures

Source: UroToday

The mean total operative time (140 vs 156 minutes, P = .04), warm ischemia time (19 vs 25 minutes, P = .03), and length of stay (2.5 vs 2.9 days, P = .03) were significantly shorter for RPN than for LPN, respectively.

RPN can produce results comparable to LPN but has disadvantages, such as cost and assistant control of the renal hilum. Additional randomized trials are needed.

A friend and expert robotic renal surgeon, Dr Bhayani, discusses his results with robotic partial nephrectomy.

The most important finding is the improvement in warm ischemia time, the amount of time the kidney is not receiving blood supply.

Another important finding is that the operation can be done quicker robotically, which can translate into a cost savings that will partially offset the increased cost of the robotic equipment.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.njurology.com/blog/mt-tb.cgi/319

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Subscribe to This Blog