Contact Associates in Urology - Pioneers in Urology Patient Information and Forms Directions to Our Office - Associates in Urology - West Orange, New Jersey Referring Physician Information Associates in Urology - Pioneers in Urology Home Associates in Urology Pysicians and Staff Urological Clinical Conditions Robotic Urological Surgery Associates in Urology CLinical Trials

« Lowering PSA and PSA velocity: Are we doing the best thing | Main | Delivery of the Median Lobe: A novel way to perform one of the most difficult parts of the dvP »

Do you need to remove the whole prostate if I have prostate cancer surgery

This is one of the most common questions that patients ask me, especially if the cancer is confined to one area on biopsy.

With robotic surgery I am able to remove part of a prostate if I want to, and I often do that for BPH operations.

prostate.jpg

For prostate cancer it is not the correct thing to do. The prostate is made up of an inner part that usually grows and causes BPH and the outer, peripheral part that is usually where the cancer starts. Once you have cancer in one area, it is likely to be in several areas. All prostate glands are at risk for developing into new cancers. I recently presented an abstract at the prostate cancer symposium in Orlando entitled:
Extent of prostate cancer in patients presenting with presumed minimal tumor burden.

This was a study I did by looking at my robotic prostatectomy database. I found patients that only had 1 area of gleason 6 cancer and a PSA of less than 10. The results and conclusions were as follows:

beige_quote.bmpOn radical prostatectomy, all cancers were organ confined and 34 of 35 cancers showed negative margins. Despite having been selected for presumed minimal tumor burden, the majority of the cases were found to be multifocal (24 cases or 69%). The pathological stage based on final pathology was most commonly T2c reflecting bilateral disease (26 cases or 74%), while the remaining 9 cases (26%) were at T2a. Lymph nodes were not assessed on these patients. The Gleason's score was upgraded to 7 in 4 patients and to 8 in 1 patient. Tumor volume was > 2 cc in 14 patients and > 5 cc in 2 patients.

Conclusions: Although prostate cancer is often diagnosed early, physicians should understand that it is difficult to predict solitary lesions based on needle core biopsy and PSA value. Our results suggest that prostate cancers are frequently multifocal and bilateral, and should be managed as such. Focused therapy that targets only a portion of the prostate gland may not be adequate for long term cancer control.

My main reason for doing the study was to show that I did not think treating part of the prostate by freezing or ultrasound was a good therapy from a cancer control standpoint.

The operation that I do currently is the same as what I did when I did open the open radical prostatectomy: I remove the prostate in its entirety, seminal vesicles, part of the vas deferens, and the pelvic lymph nodes for staging.

The main log term side effects are sexual, which I have discussed previously.

The other side effects are urinary leakage which usually gets back to normal with a better flow.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.njurology.com/blog/mt-tb.cgi/216

Comments

I had robotic surgery on May 2. Margins were clear, very early stages, surgery was declared a total success. I am taking 50mg viagra three times a week. When can I start trying some stimulation? Catheter came out 7 days after surgery. I'm having very little incontinence and was back to work part-time 12 days after surgery.

Different urologists recommend different times to avoid stimulation.

i have heard from as little as 3 weeks to as much as 6 weeks.

I ask my patients to wait 3 weeks after surgery, but have patients have intercourse as soon as 9 days. I did have 1 patient who had a lot of pain when he did that at 2 weeks. At 3 weeks I have not seen a problem yet.

In general I think stimulation is a positive thing.

I was diagnosed with prostate cancer a little over two years ago by an independent urologist. He did a test ( biopsy) that said I had cancer in one of twelve areas he was testing. He, of course was a very good doctor.

However, living in Houston, Texas with the medical complex we have, I chose to go to M.D. Anderson to have my surgery. I figured they were the best.

To make a long story short, I had my surgery. Not the robotic surgery the doctor was an expert in doing, but the radical surgery. I am a big man (223 pounds) and am glad I chose this route.

I recovered very well; however, have some incontinence problems from time to time, especially if I am drinking alcohol.

I had the nerve sparing surgery and from time to time feel that I am regaining my erection, somewhat. I feel that the nerve sparing surgery is best, if possible, in order to regain continence.

I am still somewhat depressed that this condition happened to me, yet know that over a period of time this condition will happen to most men as they age. The best advice I can offer is that you "pay attention to your primary doctor". He knows what he is doing. On my charts, he wrote "Trying to get me back to the urologist again",

Sorry for my spelling, hope some of you will get my message and experience.

Hal

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Subscribe to This Blog